
A solo founder building the infrastructure layer for autonomous AI agents — bootstrapped, lean, and revenue-focused from day one.
OpenAI just acquired OpenClaw — validating autonomous agents as the next platform shift. The explosion of wrappers in early 2026 produced 100+ competing offerings in weeks, with hundreds more in various stages of development. But they all share the same fundamental flaw: they are thin orchestrators spinning up individual VPS instances per agent. Now that OpenClaw has the backing of the world's largest AI company, the wave will only accelerate — and the broken model will break faster.
Every competitor spins up a dedicated VPS for each agent. Agents are idle 90%+ of the time, but you pay 100% of the time.
Multiple wrappers listed for sale within days of launch. No moat, no differentiation — just reselling hosting.
Tenant isolation, secrets management, and credential scoping are bolted on — not built into the architecture.
Want 50 agents? That's 50 VPS instances to manage. 100 agents? Good luck. The cost and complexity grow linearly.
76 offerings identified. 10 already listed for sale. All use a VPS-per-agent model.
| # | Name | Category | Pricing | Status | Asking Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SimpleClaw | Managed Wrapper | $29/mo per agent | For Sale | $275K |
| 2 | ClawHost | Managed Wrapper | $10–30/mo | For Sale | Unknown |
| 3 | ClawdHost | Managed Wrapper | $29/mo | For Sale | Unknown |
| 4 | ClawStack | Managed Wrapper | $9–39/mo | For Sale | ~$6K |
| 5 | SimpleClaw Shop | Managed Wrapper | $29/mo | For Sale | Unknown |
| 6 | RunClaw.sh | Managed Wrapper | $49/mo | For Sale | $50K (3.0x) |
| 7 | LobsterFarm | Managed Wrapper | $29–99/mo | For Sale | Unknown |
| 8 | OpenClawd Cloud | Managed Wrapper | $9–79/mo | For Sale | Unknown |
| 9 | BuiltWith OpenClaw | Managed Wrapper | Unknown | For Sale | $1.5K |
| 10 | iClawd | Managed Wrapper | Unknown | For Sale | $30K (5.1x) |
| 11 | LaunchClaw | Managed Wrapper | $19.99/mo | Active | — |
| 12 | ClawSimple | Managed Wrapper | $8.25/mo | Active | — |
Source: Product Hunt, X.com, GitHub, Hacker News, TrustMRR, Acquire.com, Indie Hackers, and industry analysis — February 2026. Virtually all competitors use a VPS-per-agent model. Asking prices sourced from TrustMRR and public listings.
Instead of spinning up always-on VPS instances, we separate the always-on requirements (connections, scheduling, heartbeats) into a shared control plane, and use ephemeral Firecracker microVMs for the agents themselves.

WebSocket connections, heartbeats, and cron scheduling are managed at the control plane layer — not by individual bot instances.
Bot instances spin up in under 125ms using Firecracker, the same technology powering AWS Lambda. ~5 MiB memory overhead per VM.
Agents are idle 90%+ of the time. Our architecture only runs instances when actively processing, cutting costs by 10x or more.
Each agent runs in its own isolated microVM with a dedicated kernel. Tenant isolation and credential scoping are built in, not bolted on.
Traditional wrappers charge $5–30/month per agent, with each running on an always-on VPS. Our architecture shares infrastructure at the control plane and only spins up microVMs when agents are active.
While every competitor offers a thin layer on top of OpenClaw, we have built a platform with three fundamental differentiators that create a lasting competitive moat.
Our control plane and Firecracker microVM architecture is fundamentally more efficient than the VPS-per-agent model used by every competitor. The always-on requirements — WebSocket connections, heartbeats, cron scheduling — live in a shared control plane. Individual agent instances only run when actively processing tasks, then spin down. This means an organization can deploy 100 agents for the cost of what competitors charge for 5.
Unlike single-instance wrappers where security is an afterthought, our platform is built for enterprise-grade isolation from the ground up. Each agent runs in its own Firecracker microVM with a dedicated kernel. A marketing bot gets Instagram credentials but never sees GitHub tokens. Agents can be assigned to specific team members with granular permissions. Secrets management and tenant isolation are architectural primitives, not features.
Our platform enables organizations to run multiple bots — each with its own soul, memory, and skills — all orchestrated through a single control plane. OpenClaw provides the "Souls" primitive; we provide the infrastructure to deploy, manage, and coordinate fleets of soul-bearing agents at scale. And the entire experience is white-labelable: Butlers.io targets enterprise, Squadmates.com targets teams, and StoreButler.com targets Shopify — all the same platform with a different coat of paint on top.
The primary business is a managed OpenClaw deployment platform for businesses. While every competitor sells thin wrappers, we sell infrastructure — a control plane that lets organizations deploy, manage, and orchestrate fleets of autonomous AI agents at a fraction of the cost.
Each vertical is a branded instance of the same platform — a way to test product-market fit, generate early revenue, and demonstrate the architecture's versatility. Each can become its own business with its own market economics.
One bot per entity, running on shared infrastructure, with domain-specific skills. Same platform, different coat of paint.
The AI agent market is exploding. I don't need to capture the whole wave — just carve out profitable niches where my architecture gives me a structural cost advantage. Three narrow verticals, each with clear willingness to pay.
Butlers.io / Squadmates.com — the managed OpenClaw platform for businesses. Need 100 teams at $99–249/mo = $120K–300K ARR. That's a fraction of the thousands already deploying OpenClaw agents.
Combined year-one target: ~$170K–350K ARR from the core platform plus three verticals. The platform is the primary revenue driver; verticals prove it in specific markets and generate independent case studies.

| Source | 2025 Value | Projection | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grand View Research | $7.63B | $182.97B (2033) | 49.6% |
| MarketsandMarkets | $7.84B | $52.62B (2030) | 46.3% |
| BCC Research | $5.7–8B | $48.3B (2030) | 43.3% |
| Fortune Business Insights | $7.29B | $139.19B (2034) | ~40% |
| KBV Research | — | $51.2B (2030) | 40.7% |
Our strategic plan, structured using the Entrepreneurial Operating System's Vision/Traction Organizer framework — the same framework used by thousands of successful companies to align vision with execution.
To build a lean, profitable platform that gives small teams and solo operators the same autonomous AI infrastructure that enterprises pay six figures for.
The bootstrapped, compliance-ready OpenClaw deployment platform. The core play is Butlers.io / Squadmates.com — managed multi-agent infrastructure for any business. Three beachhead niches (Shopify, DPC healthcare, independent RIAs) prove the platform in specific markets and generate independent revenue.
"We offer the most cost-effective and secure platform to deploy and manage a fleet of OpenClaw agents. If you find a more performant solution at a lower cost, we will refund your subscription."
I'm bootstrapping this from the ground up — solo founder, revenue-funded, full ownership. I'm not looking for a check. I'm looking for the right people to build alongside.
Solo founder · Revenue-funded · Full ownership
The control plane is built. The architecture works. The MVP is nearly complete. I'm taking the bootstrapped path — starting with StoreButler on Shopify, then expanding into healthcare and financial advisory niches. Each vertical funds the next.
This isn't a "move fast and raise" play. It's a "build deep, own everything, and let the product speak" play. The architecture gives me a 10x cost advantage over every competitor. That margin is my runway.
I'm looking for advisors who've built in regulated verticals, early customers who want to pilot, and strategic partners who see the same opportunity. If this resonates, let's talk.
Experienced founders who've bootstrapped in regulated verticals
Shopify stores, DPC practices, and RIAs willing to pilot
Complementary tools and platforms in our target niches